1 00:00:00,530 --> 00:00:06,350 Speaker 1: Hey everyone and thanks for jumping back into the macroverse. Today we're going to discuss 2 00:00:06,350 --> 00:00:12,910 Speaker 1: what the Federal Reserve will do at the next FOMC meeting. If you guys like the content 3 00:00:12,910 --> 00:00:16,770 Speaker 1: make sure you subscribe to the channel, get the video a thumbs up and check out the 4 00:00:16,770 --> 00:00:22,230 Speaker 1: upcoming ITC conference. Ticket prices will be going up in just about a week and a half, 5 00:00:22,390 --> 00:00:27,430 Speaker 1: November 1st. So make sure you guys get your ticket if you do want to attend. Let's go 6 00:00:27,430 --> 00:00:34,310 Speaker 1: ahead and jump in. So interest rates right now are at 4%. And it's expected 7 00:00:34,310 --> 00:00:38,110 Speaker 1: that the Fed will raise again before the end of the year. 8 00:00:39,530 --> 00:00:44,510 Speaker 1: Earlier this year, right, we talked about the Fed having to likely raise rates starting at 9 00:00:44,510 --> 00:00:49,330 Speaker 1: the September meeting. And when I talked about that, I actually got a lot of pushback on 10 00:00:49,330 --> 00:00:53,550 Speaker 1: it. A lot of people said that there was absolutely no way that the Federal Reserve would 11 00:00:53,550 --> 00:01:00,070 Speaker 1: raise rates before the midterms. But again, they did it anyways. As it 12 00:01:00,070 --> 00:01:06,810 Speaker 1: stands right now, and I think it's unlikely to change a whole lot because we already got 13 00:01:06,810 --> 00:01:13,530 Speaker 1: a lot of hot inflation reports. CPI came in hot. The producer price index came in 14 00:01:13,530 --> 00:01:20,430 Speaker 1: hot. The inflation reports were somewhat elevated. Despite all 15 00:01:20,430 --> 00:01:25,670 Speaker 1: of that, the market doesn't really seem to think there's going to be a rate hike in 16 00:01:25,670 --> 00:01:32,510 Speaker 1: October. I think I misspoke in a video not too long ago, where I said that it was an 80 % 17 00:01:32,510 --> 00:01:38,410 Speaker 1: chance to raise it's actually an 80 something percent chance to hold rates. So you have an 18 00:01:38,410 --> 00:01:45,190 Speaker 1: 80 % chance the Fed is going to hold rates steady. Now, to some degree, the 19 00:01:45,190 --> 00:01:50,550 Speaker 1: market is obviously the market today is different than 2018. I'm not trying to imply that 20 00:01:50,550 --> 00:01:57,190 Speaker 1: it's the same. But to some degree, this does in feel like deja vu from 21 00:01:57,190 --> 00:02:04,010 Speaker 1: 2018. And the reason I say that is because if you actually look at the FOMC meetings 22 00:02:04,010 --> 00:02:09,930 Speaker 1: back in 2018, if you scroll down to the September meeting, and you just click on the 23 00:02:09,930 --> 00:02:15,330 Speaker 1: statement, you can see that they decided to raise the target range for the Fed funds rate 24 00:02:15,330 --> 00:02:21,930 Speaker 1: to two to two and a quarter percent so they raised rates in september of 2018 25 00:02:21,930 --> 00:02:28,870 Speaker 1: a midterm year just like they did in 2026 all right now from there at 26 00:02:28,870 --> 00:02:34,570 Speaker 1: the next meeting the next meeting was actually what like one or two days after the midterms 27 00:02:34,570 --> 00:02:40,950 Speaker 1: it was in november in the november meeting they did not raise rates you can see that they 28 00:02:40,950 --> 00:02:47,630 Speaker 1: held rates constant at two to two and a quarter percent So far, that's tracking with what 29 00:02:47,630 --> 00:02:54,270 Speaker 1: we're seeing in 2018 as well. A rate hike in September, a pause at the next meeting, the 30 00:02:54,270 --> 00:02:59,770 Speaker 1: October to November meeting. What did they do in December back then? Because there was 31 00:02:59,770 --> 00:03:06,310 Speaker 1: another meeting in December. And what you'll see is that at that meeting, so a month, 32 00:03:06,510 --> 00:03:13,450 Speaker 1: month and a half after the midterms, they raised rates again to 2 .5%. Now, a lot of 33 00:03:13,450 --> 00:03:19,530 Speaker 1: people might look at this and say, well, they're going to raise rates in next March and 34 00:03:19,530 --> 00:03:20,450 Speaker 1: potentially next June. 35 00:03:21,890 --> 00:03:27,710 Speaker 1: This historically is not the best predictor of what's actually going to happen many, many 36 00:03:27,710 --> 00:03:31,990 Speaker 1: months out, right? Like a lot of times this just changes constantly. So I would not put a 37 00:03:31,990 --> 00:03:38,610 Speaker 1: lot of faith in this. Even the Federal Reserve often gets it wrong. If you look 38 00:03:38,610 --> 00:03:45,270 Speaker 1: at the summary of economic projections, the SCP, back in December of 39 00:03:45,270 --> 00:03:52,250 Speaker 1: 2018, what you'll see is that the Fed funds rate at the time, you know, for 2018, it says 2 40 00:03:52,250 --> 00:03:57,850 Speaker 1: .4, but they were projecting 2 .9 % for 2019, 41 00:03:58,770 --> 00:04:02,650 Speaker 1: right? And this is before the pandemic, right? Like, we're not talking about 2020 where 42 00:04:02,650 --> 00:04:08,350 Speaker 1: they were projecting 3 .1. We're just saying, look, at the end of 2018, the Fed was 43 00:04:08,350 --> 00:04:13,270 Speaker 1: essentially penciling in two more rate hikes in 2019. 44 00:04:15,850 --> 00:04:22,710 Speaker 1: If you look today, the market is assuming, let's get past the December meeting, 45 00:04:22,870 --> 00:04:28,470 Speaker 1: let's pretend like we're already at four and a quarter. The market is penciling in two more 46 00:04:28,470 --> 00:04:30,710 Speaker 1: rate hikes in 2027. 47 00:04:32,270 --> 00:04:38,970 Speaker 1: So it's clear that the market does not always know what's going to happen. It often does 48 00:04:38,970 --> 00:04:45,870 Speaker 1: not. And the Fed does not often know what's going to happen. Because back in 2018, when the 49 00:04:45,870 --> 00:04:52,690 Speaker 1: SEP was calling for two more rate hikes, the Fed didn't raise at all 50 00:04:52,690 --> 00:04:59,630 Speaker 1: in 2019. And by the end of 2019, by September or July, they 51 00:04:59,630 --> 00:05:06,590 Speaker 1: had already started cutting rates again. So don't look at this to tell you what has 52 00:05:06,590 --> 00:05:12,730 Speaker 1: to happen. Because to a large extent, the Federal Reserve just is tracking the two -year 53 00:05:12,730 --> 00:05:19,690 Speaker 1: yield, right? If interest rates are going up, it's more than likely because they are trying 54 00:05:19,690 --> 00:05:26,170 Speaker 1: to get to the two -year yield. You can see that where the two -year yield goes, the purple 55 00:05:26,170 --> 00:05:32,490 Speaker 1: line, the Fed funds rate often follows. And the two -year yield now is elevated above the 56 00:05:32,490 --> 00:05:34,350 Speaker 1: Fed funds rate at 4 .76%. 57 00:05:36,530 --> 00:05:36,970 UNKNOWN: But 58 00:05:36,970 --> 00:05:43,710 Speaker 1: it was also elevated at the end of 2018 as well, right? So think about it like this. 59 00:05:44,190 --> 00:05:50,470 Speaker 1: The two -year yield just hit 4 .9%, right? And now it's at 4 .76%, but just a little bit 60 00:05:50,470 --> 00:05:57,250 Speaker 1: ago, it hit 4 .9%. At the end of 2018, the two -year yield was at around 61 00:05:57,250 --> 00:05:58,370 Speaker 1: 2 .9%. 62 00:06:02,510 --> 00:06:09,130 Speaker 1: So the reason why the market perhaps thought that the Fed was going to raise 63 00:06:09,130 --> 00:06:10,770 Speaker 1: rates closer 64 00:06:12,190 --> 00:06:18,970 Speaker 1: to 2 .9, you can see right here 2 .9, is arguably because that's where the two -year yield 65 00:06:18,970 --> 00:06:24,590 Speaker 1: was back then when they penciled it in or around that level. But then the two year yield 66 00:06:24,590 --> 00:06:31,070 Speaker 1: came down to where the Fed funds rate was. So what happened is that policy 67 00:06:31,070 --> 00:06:37,810 Speaker 1: became restrictive, even though the Fed didn't have to raise anymore. Because if you use 68 00:06:37,810 --> 00:06:41,350 Speaker 1: the two year yield as an approximation of the neutral rate, we can all get into all sorts 69 00:06:41,350 --> 00:06:46,850 Speaker 1: of discussions as to why or why not that may or might not be the case. But when you look at 70 00:06:46,850 --> 00:06:51,930 Speaker 1: the two year yield coming back down to where the Fed funds rate was, then it turned out 71 00:06:51,930 --> 00:06:57,550 Speaker 1: that the two rate hikes the Fed had penciled in back then didn't actually have to happen. 72 00:06:58,810 --> 00:07:02,750 Speaker 1: What if the same thing happens today? Okay, what if 73 00:07:04,110 --> 00:07:11,050 Speaker 1: following the midterms, the two year yield would come back down? Now, if 74 00:07:11,050 --> 00:07:17,990 Speaker 1: you look at the, we can look at year -to -date roi of what it did in 75 00:07:17,990 --> 00:07:24,970 Speaker 1: 2018 so just looking at at the two -year yield and what we're going to do is we're just 76 00:07:24,970 --> 00:07:31,790 Speaker 1: simply going to overlay 2026 and 2018 you can see how the two -year yield went up but then 77 00:07:31,790 --> 00:07:38,230 Speaker 1: and it surged into the fomc meeting where they did not raise rates 78 00:07:38,230 --> 00:07:43,990 Speaker 1: isn't that interesting you can see the two -year yield topped on november 7th that was That 79 00:07:43,990 --> 00:07:47,770 Speaker 1: was basically when the FOMC was. 80 00:07:49,250 --> 00:07:54,150 Speaker 1: If you go back and look, you can see the meeting was November 7th to 8th. So back then, the 81 00:07:54,150 --> 00:07:56,750 Speaker 1: two -year yield topped on 82 00:07:59,020 --> 00:08:06,020 Speaker 1: November 8th, right? The day of the FOMC, where they did not raise rates. So what if 83 00:08:06,020 --> 00:08:12,220 Speaker 1: the same thing happens? What if the two -year yield goes up? Maybe it bounces into 84 00:08:12,220 --> 00:08:17,560 Speaker 1: midterms, okay? Okay, just bear with me for a moment, right? Two -year yield bounces into 85 00:08:17,560 --> 00:08:21,360 Speaker 1: midterms. The Fed does not raise rates. 86 00:08:22,900 --> 00:08:28,500 Speaker 1: The long end is spooked by this going into the midterm, so it spikes, but then it comes 87 00:08:28,500 --> 00:08:35,060 Speaker 1: down on the other side of it. If the two -year yield were to come back down after the 88 00:08:35,060 --> 00:08:41,660 Speaker 1: midterms, and let's say the Fed raises rates in December, then you're getting 89 00:08:41,660 --> 00:08:46,760 Speaker 1: awfully close to being back in restrictive territory. Because imagine if the if the two 90 00:08:46,760 --> 00:08:51,460 Speaker 1: year yield or imagine if the Fed funds rate goes up to four and a quarter, it goes up to 91 00:08:51,460 --> 00:08:57,040 Speaker 1: four and a quarter. And if the two year yield were to drop, then they're basically the same 92 00:08:57,040 --> 00:09:03,460 Speaker 1: thing, right? So that is how you could get a situation where they don't necessarily have to 93 00:09:03,460 --> 00:09:09,800 Speaker 1: raise rates as much in 2027, just like they didn't have to raise rates as much as they 94 00:09:09,800 --> 00:09:16,320 Speaker 1: thought they would have needed to in 2019. So I hope that that I mean, it might be clear as 95 00:09:16,320 --> 00:09:21,960 Speaker 1: mud. But hopefully, some of you guys are, you know, picking up what I'm throwing down, 96 00:09:22,180 --> 00:09:26,680 Speaker 1: right in the sense that it seems like a very similar setup, right? Like, it feels like the 97 00:09:26,680 --> 00:09:29,800 Speaker 1: Fed's behind and they need to raise rates because we're getting these hot inflation reports 98 00:09:29,800 --> 00:09:32,920 Speaker 1: and they're just not raising rates more than likely at the october meeting 99 00:09:35,180 --> 00:09:35,700 UNKNOWN: again 100 00:09:35,700 --> 00:09:41,400 Speaker 1: only like a 16 chance they raise rates so imagine that imagine the two -year yield surges 101 00:09:41,400 --> 00:09:47,300 Speaker 1: into that and then following that two -year yield drops the fed raises in december and then 102 00:09:47,300 --> 00:09:51,340 Speaker 1: all of a sudden the fed funds rate and the approximation of the neutral rate are nearly 103 00:09:51,340 --> 00:09:56,980 Speaker 1: identical so then going into 2027 perhaps they end up holding for a while 104 00:09:56,980 --> 00:10:02,880 Speaker 1: it's a compelling narrative right i mean it really is and i mean history doesn't always 105 00:10:02,880 --> 00:10:06,960 Speaker 1: repeat itself but it certainly does rhyme i just want people to be aware of of that 106 00:10:06,960 --> 00:10:11,160 Speaker 1: potential outcome because i remember you know looking at some of this stuff back then and 107 00:10:11,160 --> 00:10:15,800 Speaker 1: thinking like okay they're gonna like they're gonna have to raise rates the the scp is 108 00:10:15,800 --> 00:10:22,780 Speaker 1: calling for two more rate hikes in 2019 and those rate hikes never actually happened. So I 109 00:10:22,780 --> 00:10:28,140 Speaker 1: could see us getting one more rate hike in December. But after that, I would I would not be 110 00:10:28,140 --> 00:10:33,040 Speaker 1: so deterministic. Okay, I think one more rate hike is in the cards before the end of the 111 00:10:33,040 --> 00:10:40,020 Speaker 1: year. But once we get out of 2027, you have to start to wonder if the long 112 00:10:40,020 --> 00:10:46,340 Speaker 1: end going up as much as it has, if that's going to start to weigh on on businesses. 113 00:10:46,700 --> 00:10:52,380 Speaker 1: And if it does, and you start to see growth scares, then there's not going to be, you know, 114 00:10:52,580 --> 00:10:58,960 Speaker 1: those rate hikes just simply might not manifest at all. Okay, so, and remember with the 115 00:10:58,960 --> 00:11:04,140 Speaker 1: long end, what normally happens in the last couple of midterm years is it tops in October, 116 00:11:04,760 --> 00:11:10,540 Speaker 1: it puts in a top in October, it then drops, and then it rallies back into the midterms. 117 00:11:11,140 --> 00:11:12,440 Speaker 1: Sometimes it's a higher high, 118 00:11:13,660 --> 00:11:19,820 Speaker 1: sometimes it's a lower high, and then it drops after the midterms. So I feel like the 119 00:11:19,820 --> 00:11:25,820 Speaker 1: playbook's there and it's like, it seems like this is what's likely going to happen. So 120 00:11:25,820 --> 00:11:31,060 Speaker 1: let's see if it does, because if it does, then we might just be running the same playbook 121 00:11:31,060 --> 00:11:36,240 Speaker 1: eight years later. Right. So those are my views. My guess is the Fed's not going to raise 122 00:11:36,240 --> 00:11:42,560 Speaker 1: rates in October, which is coming up in about nine days, the FOMC meeting about nine days. 123 00:11:42,740 --> 00:11:48,500 Speaker 1: I'm guessing they're not going to raise rates. I think you'll likely see you know yields go 124 00:11:48,500 --> 00:11:52,100 Speaker 1: back up into the midterms and then after that you'll see them fall and then as they're 125 00:11:52,100 --> 00:11:56,320 Speaker 1: falling in December the federal raise rates again that'll get the fed funds rate basically 126 00:11:56,320 --> 00:12:00,740 Speaker 1: equivalent to the two -year yield and then from there I'm guessing they might end up 127 00:12:00,740 --> 00:12:05,480 Speaker 1: holding for a while in 2027. If you guys like the content make sure you subscribe to the 128 00:12:05,480 --> 00:12:09,260 Speaker 1: channel give the video a thumbs up also check out the sale on Into the Cryptoverse Premium 129 00:12:09,260 --> 00:12:13,900 Speaker 1: at into the cryptoverse .com and as a reminder make sure you get your ticket to the 130 00:12:13,900 --> 00:12:18,660 Speaker 1: upcoming investing through the cycles conference taking place in Miami uh main conference 131 00:12:18,660 --> 00:12:22,220 Speaker 1: day will be November 21st we'll have some stuff going on November 20th as well links in the 132 00:12:22,220 --> 00:12:25,220 Speaker 1: description below or the pinned comment I will see you guys next time bye